I have never been that lucky on this lottery thing so I won't guess who will win. Like cnxs said, higher ranked draft picks do not always turn out to be better or more valuable players, the future outcome depends on a lot of factors, such as talents, determinations, attitude, intelligence, injuries etc. In particular, this year, I don't think there is any clear cut players who will obviously be better than others. I have seen quite a few of them played in NCAA playoff, and most have their own significant shortcomings, IMO.作者: stevkang8 時間: 2017-5-17 12:16 AM
賽爾提克怎麼會這麼爽XD
不過拿了Ball或是Fultz前面卡了一個IT好像也不是什麼好事作者: mcgrady0117 時間: 2017-5-17 12:25 AM
希望籃網抽個爛千,讓賽兌換不到好的順位作者: 11224455 時間: 2017-5-17 01:10 AM
超賽當年解散
是因為制服組有預知能力嗎?作者: 就是愛超正妹 時間: 2017-5-17 02:48 AM
抽籤真的是要靠運氣~沒有絕對會中作者: visit999 時間: 2017-5-17 03:07 AM
本帖最後由 visit999 於 2017-5-17 03:46 AM 編輯
mcgrady0117 發表於 2017-5-17 12:25 AM
希望籃網抽個爛千,讓賽兌換不到好的順位
Impossible. For the #1 draft seed (Nets), the lowest pick will be pick #4 (35.7% chance). In my opinion, there are no clear standout in this year's draft, so depending on the team's biggest need, either a guard or a forward could be picked. A more likely scenario is that Danny Ainge may pick a bad candidate. 作者: albert5415 時間: 2017-5-17 05:09 AM
籃網如果有機會,不知道會不會選Ball,他應該不會想當替補作者: 劉忠門 時間: 2017-5-17 10:24 AM
塞爾提克籤運超好
搶下狀元籤
再加上今年還有打進東區冠軍戰
如果選秀補強得宜
明年有機會大躍進甚至威脅到三巨頭的騎士作者: MWWANG343 時間: 2017-5-17 10:43 AM